509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15610542)
1. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
