133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15611797)
1. Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997-2003.
Caldon LJ; Walters SJ; Reed JA; Murphy A; Worley A; Reed MW
Br J Cancer; 2005 Jan; 92(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 15611797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case-mix analysis and variation in rates of non-surgical treatment of older women with operable breast cancer.
Morgan J; Richards P; Ward S; Francis M; Lawrence G; Collins K; Reed M; Wyld L
Br J Surg; 2015 Aug; 102(9):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26095684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation in management of small invasive breast cancers detected on screening in the former south east Thames region: observational study.
Moritz S; Bates T; Henderson SM; Humphreys S; Michell MJ
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1266-72. PubMed ID: 9390053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors predictive of treatment by Australian breast surgeons of invasive female breast cancer by mastectomy rather than breast conserving surgery.
Roder D; Zorbas H; Kollias J; Pyke C; Walters D; Campbell I; Taylor C; Webster F
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):539-45. PubMed ID: 23534791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.
McCahill LE; Single RM; Aiello Bowles EJ; Feigelson HS; James TA; Barney T; Engel JM; Onitilo AA
JAMA; 2012 Feb; 307(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 22298678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variation in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in the UK: Results of the Mammary Fold National Practice Survey.
Mammary Fold Academic and Research Collaborative
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1153-61. PubMed ID: 27344543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the influence of comorbidities on choice of surgical operation in the Department of Defense health care system.
Zhou J; Enewold L; Zahm SH; Jatoi I; Shriver C; Anderson WF; Jeffery DD; Andaya A; Potter JF; McGlynn KA; Zhu K
Am J Surg; 2013 Sep; 206(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 23866763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer.
Jagsi R; Abrahamse P; Morrow M; Hawley ST; Griggs JJ; Graff JJ; Hamilton AS; Katz SJ
J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(14):2396-403. PubMed ID: 20351324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does it matter where you go for breast surgery?: attending surgeon's influence on variation in receipt of mastectomy for breast cancer.
Katz SJ; Hawley ST; Abrahamse P; Morrow M; Friese CR; Alderman AK; Griggs JJ; Hamilton AS; Graff JJ; Hofer TP
Med Care; 2010 Oct; 48(10):892-9. PubMed ID: 20808256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ in Australia in 1995.
Shugg D; White VM; Kitchen PR; Pruden M; Collins JP; Hill DJ
ANZ J Surg; 2002 Oct; 72(10):708-15. PubMed ID: 12534380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional variation in surgical care for early-stage breast cancer at community hospitals.
Dodgion CM; Lipsitz SR; Decker MR; Hu YY; Quamme SRP; Karcz A; D'Avolio L; Greenberg CC
J Surg Res; 2017 May; 211():196-205. PubMed ID: 28501117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Roumen RM; Jansen FH; Voogd AC
Br J Surg; 2014 Jul; 101(8):949-58. PubMed ID: 24828281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in elderly women.
Gold HT; Dick AW
Med Care; 2004 Mar; 42(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 15076826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Declining use of mastectomy for invasive breast cancer in Canada, 1981-2000.
Gaudette LA; Gao RN; Spence A; Shi F; Johansen H; Olivotto IA
Can J Public Health; 2004; 95(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 15490921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variations in Persistent Use of Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery.
Wang T; Bredbeck BC; Sinco B; Shubeck S; Baskin AS; Skolarus T; Dossett LA
JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 33533894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon and breast unit volume-outcome relationships in breast cancer surgery and treatment.
McDermott AM; Wall DM; Waters PS; Cheung S; Sibbering M; Horgan K; Kearins O; Lawrence G; Patnick J; Kerin MJ;
Ann Surg; 2013 Nov; 258(5):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 23989053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes in therapy for breast cancer patients as a result of mammography screening. An analysis of Bavarian cancer registry data from 2000 to 2008].
Schrodi S; Braisch U; Schenkirsch G; Maisel T; Petsch S; Hölzel D; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Mäder U; Schuller L; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Meyer M; Engel J
Gesundheitswesen; 2013 Oct; 75(10):632-42. PubMed ID: 23404360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using Multilevel Models to Explain Variation in Clinical Practice: Surgeon Volume and the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer.
Fisher S; Yasui Y; Dabbs K; Winget M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):1845-51. PubMed ID: 26842490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in the management of the axilla in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: evidence from the UK NHS breast screening programme audit of screen detected DCIS.
Nicholson S; Hanby A; Clements K; Kearins O; Lawrence G; Dodwell D; Bishop H; Thompson A;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25441934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.
Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
