319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15612156)
1. Managed care does not appear to have a spillover effect on the quality of diabetes care for Medicare patients.
Edwards S
Find Brief; 2004 Dec; 7(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 15612156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicare+Choice: challenges and opportunities.
Marlowe JF; Holloway MC
Empl Benefits J; 1998 Dec; 23(4):32-43. PubMed ID: 10339147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do increases in the market share of managed care influence quality of cancer care in the fee-for-service sector?
Keating NL; Landrum MB; Meara E; Ganz PA; Guadagnoli E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 15713960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More managed care for Medicare.
Atkinson W
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 12675004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can managed care save Medicare?
Lawniczak J
Caring; 1995 Sep; 14(9):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10151231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved care and outcomes among elderly medicare managed care beneficiaries with diabetes.
McBean AM; Jung K; Virnig BA
Am J Manag Care; 2005 Apr; 11(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 15839182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncovering value in the Medicare+Choice marketplace.
Ahl D
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 12148482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Market and beneficiary characteristics associated with enrollment in Medicare managed care plans and fee-for-service.
Shimada SL; Zaslavsky AM; Zaborski LB; O'Malley AJ; Heller A; Cleary PD
Med Care; 2009 May; 47(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 19365291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining a future for fee-for-service Medicare.
Foote SB; Halaas GW
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(3):864-8. PubMed ID: 16684754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a Medicare+Choice makeover attract plans, providers?
Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Jan; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11822184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can fee-for-service Medicare learn from managed care?
Fox PD
Healthplan; 1999; 40(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 10537466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. No advantage. Little quality progress at managed-care plans: report.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Oct; 37(39):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCFA demo sites offer a smorgasbord of managed care innovation.
Dis Manag Advis; 2001 Apr; 7(4):52-7, 49. PubMed ID: 11345904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Managed Medicare: an overview for the primary care physician.
Colenda CC; Sherman FT
Geriatrics; 1998 Jan; 53(1):57-63; quiz 64. PubMed ID: 9442764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rising cap rates offer big upside in Medicare Advantage plans.
Capitation Rates Data; 2004 Aug; 9(8):85-9. PubMed ID: 15487582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Medicare disadvantage.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2007 May; 103(5):41-2. PubMed ID: 17824475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managed care accelerates.
Harris E
Mich Health Hosp; 1996; 32(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 10157731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. To be, or not to be? Medicare pilot project moves ahead; questions remain.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1998 Nov; 28(45):8. PubMed ID: 10187328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of care of Medicare patients with diabetes in a metropolitan fee-for-service primary care integrated delivery system.
Hollander P; Nicewander D; Couch C; Winter D; Herrin J; Haydar Z; Ballard DJ
Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(6):344-52. PubMed ID: 16280398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare Advantage's private fee-for-service plans: paying for coordinated care without the coordination.
Biles B; Adrion E; Guterman S
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2008 Oct; 48():1-12. PubMed ID: 18953765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
