These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15612481)

  • 1. [Safety assessment of GM yeast feed additive with cecropin CAD gene].
    Deng P; Fang S; Yang D; Jiang L; Yu X; Huang Y; Huang Z
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Sep; 33(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 15612481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event.
    Knudsen I; Poulsen M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of feed additives and contaminants: an essential component of food safety.
    Mantovani A; Maranghi F; Purificato I; Macrì A
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 17361066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants.
    van den Eede G; Aarts H; Buhk HJ; Corthier G; Flint HJ; Hammes W; Jacobsen B; Midtvedt T; van der Vossen J; von Wright A; Wackernagel W; Wilcks A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1127-56. PubMed ID: 15123384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety assessment of a modified acetolactate synthase protein (GM-HRA) used as a selectable marker in genetically modified soybeans.
    Mathesius CA; Barnett JF; Cressman RF; Ding J; Carpenter C; Ladics GS; Schmidt J; Layton RJ; Zhang JX; Appenzeller LM; Carlson G; Ballou S; Delaney B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 55(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 19682528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multigeneration reproductive and developmental toxicity study of bar gene inserted into genetically modified potato on rats.
    Rhee GS; Cho DH; Won YH; Seok JH; Kim SS; Kwack SJ; Lee RD; Chae SY; Kim JW; Lee BM; Park KL; Choi KS
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2005 Dec; 68(23-24):2263-76. PubMed ID: 16326439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Strategies for safety assessment of genetically modified crops: current and future development].
    Zhuo Q; Yang XG
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2005 Mar; 34(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 15952675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops.
    Parrott W; Chassy B; Ligon J; Meyer L; Petrick J; Zhou J; Herman R; Delaney B; Levine M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1773-90. PubMed ID: 20399824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current issues connected with usage of genetically modified crops in production of feed and livestock feeding.
    Kwiatek K; Mazur M; Sieradzki Z
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2008; 11(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 19227143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants.
    Flachowsky G; Chesson A; Aulrich K
    Arch Anim Nutr; 2005 Feb; 59(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 15889650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Edible safety requirements and assessment standards for agricultural genetically modified organisms.
    Deng P; Zhou X; Zhou P; Du Z; Hou H; Yang D; Tan J; Wu X; Zhang J; Yang Y; Liu J; Liu G; Li Y; Liu J; Yu L; Fang S; Yang X
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46(5):1414-36. PubMed ID: 18289760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do whole-food animal feeding studies have any value in the safety assessment of GM crops?
    Herman RA; Ekmay R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 23851038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for coexistence of GM and non-GM soy from import to feed processing.
    Gryson N; Eeckhout M; Trouillier A; Le Bail M; Soler LG
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 20028618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical and biological safety assessment of genetically modified maize strain MIR604].
    Tutel'ian VA; Gapparov MM; Avren'eva LI; Aksiuk IN; Guseva GV; Kravchenko LV; L'vova LS; Saprykin VP; Tyshko NV; Chernysheva ON
    Vopr Pitan; 2009; 78(2):24-32. PubMed ID: 19514339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Food safety of GMOs].
    Joudrier P
    J Soc Biol; 2009; 203(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 20122394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies to evaluate the safety of bioengineered foods.
    Delaney B
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26(5):389-99. PubMed ID: 17963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.