98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1561332)
1. Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy?
Ruwe PA; Wright J; Randall RL; Lynch JK; Jokl P; McCarthy S
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 1561332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive patients.
Bui-Mansfield LT; Youngberg RA; Warme W; Pitcher JD; Nguyen PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):913-8. PubMed ID: 9124139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The investigation and treatment of disorders of the knee: indications and a cost-comparison of arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.
Birch N; Powles D; Dorrell H; Brooks P
Health Trends; 1994; 26(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 10137727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with internal derangement of the knee.
Suarez-Almazor ME; Kaul P; Kendall CJ; Saunders LD; Johnston DW
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):392-405. PubMed ID: 10507197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR scanning of the acutely injured knee: sensitive, but is it cost effective?
Boden SD; Labropoulos PA; Vailas JC
Arthroscopy; 1990; 6(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 2124808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo of the knee joint as a limited protocol in evaluating internal knee derangements.
Khoury NJ; Mahfoud Z; Masrouha KZ; Elkattah R; Assaad T; Abdallah A; Hourani MH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 21926865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of the time factor in diagnostic algorithm of knee joint trauma on diagnostic ability of the magnetic resonance imaging].
Kleinrok K; Podsiadło K; Sorysz T; Urbanik A
Przegl Lek; 2013; 70(5):293-8. PubMed ID: 23944099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging: effectiveness and costs at triage of patients with nonacute knee symptoms.
Vincken PW; ter Braak AP; van Erkel AR; Coerkamp EG; de Rooy TP; de Lange S; Mallens WM; Coene LN; Bloem RM; van Luijt PA; van den Hout WB; van Houwelingen HC; Bloem JL
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 17090714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests.
Lee JK; Yao L; Phelps CT; Wirth CR; Czajka J; Lozman J
Radiology; 1988 Mar; 166(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 3340785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Traumatic knee injuries: the accuracy of MRI compared with arthroscopy.
Ng J; Baron M; Ng AC; Bessette J; Vahey T; Shelbourne KD; Chua GT
Indiana Med; 1989 Nov; 82(11):886-90. PubMed ID: 2614069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health technology assessment of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.
Huysse WC; Verstraete KL
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 18248929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for arthroscopy of the knee.
Vincken PW; ter Braak BP; van Erkell AR; de Rooy TP; Mallens WM; Post W; Bloem JL
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):739-46. PubMed ID: 12034943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of posterior cruciate ligament fibers: clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up.
Ahn JH; Yang HS; Jeong WK; Koh KH
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 16303881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Role of magnetic resonance in acute capsular-ligamentous pathology of the knee].
Pinto R; Del Vecchio E; Ragozzino A; Romano L; Accarino B; Barile V
Radiol Med; 1988 Dec; 76(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 3212239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging.
Kim S; Huh YM; Song HT; Lee SA; Lee JW; Lee JE; Chung IH; Suh JS
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):225-35. PubMed ID: 17185669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet.
Rothschild PA; Domesek JM; Kaufman L; Kramer DM; Dye SF; Anderson LJ; Lewis JL; Gon MK
Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 2343129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Knee injuries: MRI findings].
Ege G; Akman H; Kuzucu K; Ertem E; Sahlan S
Ulus Travma Derg; 2001 Jan; 7(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11705177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [1.5-T MR of the knee: the correlations with arthroscopy].
Cerofolini E; Spina V; Miceli F; D'Alimonte P; Leoni A; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1989 May; 77(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 2748956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
