These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1561354)
21. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography]. Horino K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications. Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms: an observer performance study. Good WF; Sumkin JH; Ganott M; Hardesty L; Holbert B; Johns CM; Klym AH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Dec; 175(6):1573-6. PubMed ID: 11090378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager. Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms. De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography]. Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis]. Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms. Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications. Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications. Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnosis of breast calcifications: comparison of contact, magnified, and television-enhanced images. Kimme-Smith C; Gold RH; Bassett LW; Gormley L; Morioka C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):963-7. PubMed ID: 2801445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers. Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of dose reduction on the ability of digital mammography to detect simulated microcalcifications. Yakabe M; Sakai S; Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Cho M; Masuda M; Sasaki M J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 19415382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using an add-on unit. Becker L; Taves D; McCurdy L; Muscedere G; Karlik S; Ward S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1451-7. PubMed ID: 11717106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image compression in digital mammography: effects on computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications. Chan HP; Lo SC; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 8873029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques. Kheddache S; Thilander-Klang A; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Bjurstam N; Ackerholm P; Björneld L Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 10354868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Observer performance of PACS-oriented digitized mammography in the detection of fibrils, microcalcifications, and masses: a phantom study]. Yamada S; Ueguchi T; Mihara N; Matsuzawa H; Sukenobu Y; Komizu M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 May; 65(5):620-5. PubMed ID: 19498251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]