These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15614226)

  • 1. [Measurement of effective dose of the assisting person in diagnostic X-ray examination].
    Nakamura K; Ide R; Shimizu A; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1739-46. PubMed ID: 15614226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dose estimation for exposure conditions of diagnostic radiology acquired by a 2011 questionnaire in a phantom study].
    Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi K; Asada Y; Takikawa Y; Yamada M; Suzuki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 24366557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
    Havukainen R; Pirinen M
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure in whole body and cranial CT studies in relation to parameters of the examination technic].
    Fiebach BJ; Ewen K; Makoski HB
    Computertomographie; 1983 Sep; 3(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 6640578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
    Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective dose evaluation for chest and abdomen X-ray tests.
    Lee SC; Wang JN; Liu SC; Jiang SH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):613-9. PubMed ID: 16604711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of source to image distance on radiation risk to the patient.
    Poletti J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):110-4. PubMed ID: 14626849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
    Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
    Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
    Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques.
    Jones NF; Palarm TW; Negus IS
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):920-5. PubMed ID: 11675309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopaedic surgery.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1698-703. PubMed ID: 12954827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Reference Levels for conventional radiography and fluoroscopy in Austria: Results and updated National Diagnostic Reference Levels derived from a nationwide survey.
    Wachabauer D; Röthlin F; Moshammer HM; Homolka P
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():135-139. PubMed ID: 30927937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.
    Johnston DA; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):396-402. PubMed ID: 10844865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose comparison between conventional and quasi-monochromatic systems for diagnostic radiology.
    Baldelli P; Taibi A; Tuffanelli A; Gambaccini M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4135-46. PubMed ID: 15470928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Investigation on reduction of radiation dose and optimization of exposure parameters in radiography].
    Fei DS
    Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Apr; 23(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 2758928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.