154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15615067)
1. Consequences of gene flow.
Snow AA
Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 15615067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Plant sciences. Will GM rapeseed cut the mustard?
Heritage J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):401-3. PubMed ID: 14563995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session V: Estimating likelihood and exposure.
Lentini Z
Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 17640506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible implication of the release of transgenic crops in centers of origin or diversity.
Alvarez-Morales A
Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 15615068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant cropping systems on weed seedbanks in two years of following crops.
Firbank LG; Rothery P; May MJ; Clark SJ; Scott RJ; Stuart RC; Boffey CW; Brooks DR; Champion GT; Haughton AJ; Hawes C; Heard MS; Dewar AM; Perry JN; Squire GR
Biol Lett; 2006 Mar; 2(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 17148348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geneflow from GM plants--towards a more quantitative risk assessment.
Poppy GM
Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):436-8. PubMed ID: 15331221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study.
Légère A
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 15593291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fitness effects of transgenic disease resistance in sunflowers.
Burke JM; Rieseberg LH
Science; 2003 May; 300(5623):1250. PubMed ID: 12764188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential for gene flow from genetically modified Brassica napus on the territory of Russia.
Mikhaylova EV; Kuluev BR
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):557. PubMed ID: 30159768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes.
Jenczewski E; Ronfort J; Chèvre AM
Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 15615064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant fitness assessment for wild relatives of insect resistant crops.
Letourneau DK; Hagen JA
Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 19419653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom.
Wilkinson MJ; Elliott LJ; Allainguillaume J; Shaw MW; Norris C; Welters R; Alexander M; Sweet J; Mason DC
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):457-9. PubMed ID: 14551318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-bred crops get fit faster.
Gilbert N
Nature; 2014 Sep; 513(7518):292. PubMed ID: 25230627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pollen-Mediated Gene Flow in Maize: Implications for Isolation Requirements and Coexistence in Mexico, the Center of Origin of Maize.
Baltazar BM; Castro Espinoza L; Espinoza Banda A; de la Fuente Martínez JM; Garzón Tiznado JA; González García J; Gutiérrez MA; Guzmán Rodríguez JL; Heredia Díaz O; Horak MJ; Madueño Martínez JI; Schapaugh AW; Stojšin D; Uribe Montes HR; Zavala García F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131549. PubMed ID: 26162097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-pollination between genetically modified and conventional oilseed rape fields.
Degrieck I; Van Bockstaele E; De Loose M
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(2 Pt B):385-8. PubMed ID: 24757775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air-mediated pollen flow from genetically modified to conventional crops.
Kuparinen A; Schurr F; Tackenberg O; O'Hara RB
Ecol Appl; 2007 Mar; 17(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 17489250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session IV: Identifying and defining hazards and potential consequences III: Concepts for problem formulation and non-target risk assessment.
Alvarez-Morales A
Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 17640505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Agbiotech. A little pollen goes a long way.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5577):2314. PubMed ID: 12089415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session VI: Estimating likelihood and exposure, Part II.
Quemada H
Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):197-9. PubMed ID: 17640507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
