These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15615527)

  • 1. "Lead hopping". Validation of topomer similarity as a superior predictor of similar biological activities.
    Cramer RD; Jilek RJ; Guessregen S; Clark SJ; Wendt B; Clark RD
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6777-91. PubMed ID: 15615527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dbtop: topomer similarity searching of conventional structure databases.
    Cramer RD; Jilek RJ; Andrews KM
    J Mol Graph Model; 2002 Jun; 20(6):447-62. PubMed ID: 12071279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA.
    Cramer RD; Cruz P; Stahl G; Curtiss WC; Campbell B; Masek BB; Soltanshahi F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2180-95. PubMed ID: 18956863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Topomer CoMFA: a design methodology for rapid lead optimization.
    Cramer RD
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jan; 46(3):374-88. PubMed ID: 12540237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2D fingerprint methods for multiple-template similarity searching on compound activity classes of increasing structural diversity.
    Tovar A; Eckert H; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Feb; 2(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of ligand based virtual screening methods and application to corticotropin releasing factor 1 receptor.
    Tresadern G; Bemporad D; Howe T
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009; 27(8):860-70. PubMed ID: 19230731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients.
    Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Alex A; Loesel J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1840-8. PubMed ID: 15446844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and evaluation of a molecular fingerprint involving the transformation of property descriptor values into a binary classification scheme.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 12870906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward general methods of targeted library design: topomer shape similarity searching with diverse structures as queries.
    Andrews KM; Cramer RD
    J Med Chem; 2000 May; 43(9):1723-40. PubMed ID: 10794690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening.
    Vogt M; Stumpfe D; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5707-15. PubMed ID: 20684607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2515-26. PubMed ID: 17125192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
    Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scaffold hopping using clique detection applied to reduced graphs.
    Barker EJ; Buttar D; Cosgrove DA; Gardiner EJ; Kitts P; Willett P; Gillet VJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 16562978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between Molecular Complexity, Biological Activity, and Structural Diversity.
    Schuffenhauer A; Brown N; Selzer P; Ertl P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):525-35. PubMed ID: 16562980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective identification of biologically active structures by topomer shape similarity searching.
    Cramer RD; Poss MA; Hermsmeier MA; Caulfield TJ; Kowala MC; Valentine MT
    J Med Chem; 1999 Sep; 42(19):3919-33. PubMed ID: 10508440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of virtual screening performance of support vector machines trained by sparsely distributed active compounds.
    Ma XH; Wang R; Yang SY; Li ZR; Xue Y; Wei YC; Low BC; Chen YZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1227-37. PubMed ID: 18533644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioisosteric similarity of molecules based on structural alignment and observed chemical replacements in drugs.
    Krier M; Hutter MC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 May; 49(5):1280-97. PubMed ID: 19402687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
    Zhang Q; Muegge I
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of molecular fingerprint methods on the basis of biological profile data.
    Steffen A; Kogej T; Tyrchan C; Engkvist O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):338-47. PubMed ID: 19434835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    Drug Discov Today; 2007 Mar; 12(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 17331887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.