796 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15615957)
1. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.
Neri E; Giusti P; Battolla L; Vagli P; Boraschi P; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Bartolozzi C
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 12034925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.
Yee J; Akerkar GA; Hung RK; Steinauer-Gebauer AM; Wall SD; McQuaid KR
Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 11376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multislice spiral CT colonography in the evaluation of colorectal neoplasms.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Trenna S; Mangiapane F; Sinibaldi G; Piacentini F; Sammartino P; Stipa V; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2002; 104(5-6):394-403. PubMed ID: 12589260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps: a feasibility study.
Yasuda T; Honda T; Utano K; Kato T; Togashi K; Yamaguchi S; Yasaka T
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):831-839. PubMed ID: 35344130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual CT colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a prospective study.
Abdel Razek AA; Abu Zeid MM; Bilal M; Abdel Wahab NM
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1698-702. PubMed ID: 16334760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.
Mulhall BP; Veerappan GR; Jackson JL
Ann Intern Med; 2005 Apr; 142(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 15838071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of computed tomographic colonography for the screening of colorectal polyp in acromegalic patients: a prospective study.
Ramos O; Boguszewski CL; Teixeira S; De Bem R; Parolim B; Prolla JC
Arq Gastroenterol; 2009; 46(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 19578607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps.
Munikrishnan V; Gillams AR; Lees WR; Vaizey CJ; Boulos PB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Oct; 46(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 14530680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
