These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15617929)

  • 1. Effect of instrument rotation on handheld keratometry.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2590-4. PubMed ID: 15617929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of posture and artificial tears on corneal power measurements with a handheld automated keratometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 15050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children.
    Huynh SC; Mai TQ; Kifley A; Wang JJ; Rose KA; Mitchell P
    Cornea; 2006 May; 25(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 16670473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry.
    Srivannaboon S; Soeharnila ; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2088-93. PubMed ID: 22985831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of general anesthesia and muscle relaxants on keratometry measurements using a handheld keratometer.
    Al-Haddad C; Jurdy L; Farhat A; Farah F; Aouad M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 25036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, and axis location in normal eyes obtained from an autokeratometer and a corneal topographer.
    Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Ishii R; Sato N; Wang G; Shimizu K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):648-54. PubMed ID: 22342010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal power measurements in fixating versus anesthetized nonfixating children using a handheld keratometer.
    Rogers DL; Whitehead GR; Stephens JA; Fellows RR; Bremer DL; McGregor ML; Golden RP; Cassady CB; Rogers GL
    J AAPOS; 2010 Feb; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20227615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the ARK-700A autokeratometer and Medmont E300 corneal topographer when measuring peripheral corneal curvature.
    González-Méijome JM; Jorge J; Queiros A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 15315653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer.
    Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 153(1):55-61.e2. PubMed ID: 21907967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: comparative study of normal eyes.
    Read SA; Collins MJ; Iskander DR; Davis BA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1072-81. PubMed ID: 19465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.
    Mao X; Savini G; Zhuo Z; Feng Y; Zhang J; Wang Q; Chen H; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1561-9. PubMed ID: 23860010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a handheld automated keratometer in adults.
    Noonan CP; Rao GP; Kaye SB; Green JR; Chandna A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 9559480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.
    Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry.
    Sunderraj P
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 1)():60-2. PubMed ID: 1426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a modified keratometer in the study of corneal topography on Chinese subjects.
    Lam AK; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 8762774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asphericity of the anterior human cornea with different corneal diameters.
    González-Méijome JM; Villa-Collar C; Montés-Micó R; Gomes A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 17321398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye.
    Chen D; Lam AK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17321396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking.
    Vinciguerra P; Albè E; Trazza S; Rosetta P; Vinciguerra R; Seiler T; Epstein D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 19167087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of an artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the central corneal curvature.
    Lam AK; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9135808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.