57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15617969)
1. Assessment of the distraction regenerate using three-dimensional quantitative computer tomography.
Swennen GR; Eulzer C; Schutyser F; Hüttmann C; Schliephake H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 34(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15617969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of platelet-rich-plasma on cranial distraction osteogenesis in sheep: preliminary clinical and radiographic results.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F; Mueller MC; Kramer FJ; Eulzer C; Schliephake H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 34(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 15741039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method for measuring and monitoring monobloc distraction osteogenesis using three-dimensional computed tomography rendered images with the "biporion-dorsum sellae" plane. Part II: comparison of measurements before and after distraction.
Salyer KE; Por YC; Genecov DG; Barcelo CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 18362713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of micro-CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research.
Gielkens PF; Schortinghuis J; de Jong JR; Huysmans MC; Leeuwen MB; Raghoebar GM; Bos RR; Stegenga B
Arch Oral Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(6):558-66. PubMed ID: 18190892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note.
d'Hauthuille C; Taha F; Devauchelle B; Testelin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15695051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cranial growth after distraction osteogenesis of the craniosynostosis.
Kim YO; Choi JW; Kim DS; Lee WJ; Yoo SK; Kim HJ; Choi JE; Park By
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 18216664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified animal model and computer-assisted approach for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis to reconstruct unilateral maxillectomy defect.
Feng Z; Zhao J; Zhou L; Dong Y; Zhao Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2266-74. PubMed ID: 19761922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Ozeç Y; Oztürk M; Kýlýç E; Yeler H; Göze F; Gümüş C
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 16432412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental studies on the effect of osteotomy technique on the bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis.
Krawczyk A; Kuropka P; Kuryszko J; Wall A; Dragan S; Kulej M
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 17140872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of simvastatin on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Kiliç E; Ozeç I; Yeler H; Korkmaz A; Ayas B; Gümüş C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2233-8. PubMed ID: 18940485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted distraction osteogenesis by Ilizarov's method.
Simpson AL; Ma B; Slagel B; Borschneck DP; Ellis RE
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):310-20. PubMed ID: 18924116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histology of the regenerate and docking site in bone transport.
Garcia FL; Picado CH; Garcia SB
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Apr; 129(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 18297297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.
Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA
Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of pQCT bone strength index with mechanical testing in distraction osteogenesis.
Kokoroghiannis C; Charopoulos I; Lyritis G; Raptou P; Karachalios T; Papaioannou N
Bone; 2009 Sep; 45(3):512-6. PubMed ID: 19497394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calvarial reshaping using bifocal bidirectional transport distraction osteogenesis.
Durmus M; Zor F; Ozturk S; Bozlar U; Turegun M; Sengezer M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):756-61. PubMed ID: 19954875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transport distraction osteogenesis for closing full-thickness calvarial defects in sheep.
Icekson M; Regev E; Neuman R; Margulis A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Jul; 46(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 19642769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cranial distraction osteogenesis in sheep using a totally implantable hydraulic mechanism: early results.
Currie LJ; Flapper W; McNicoll SB
Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 54(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 11428767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
