These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15618026)

  • 1. Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography.
    Hoffmann R; von Bardeleben S; ten Cate F; Borges AC; Kasprzak J; Firschke C; Lafitte S; Al-Saadi N; Kuntz-Hehner S; Engelhardt M; Becher H; Vanoverschelde JL
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Mar; 26(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 15618026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by monoplane cineventriculography, unenhanced echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Li C; Lossnitzer D; Katus HA; Buss SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1003-10. PubMed ID: 21792621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiographies versus cineventriculography versus cardiac magnetic resonance for determination of left ventricular function.
    Hoffmann R; von Bardeleben S; Barletta G; Pasques A; Kasprzak J; Greis C; Becher H
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 24188892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods.
    Hoffmann R; von Bardeleben S; Kasprzak JD; Borges AC; ten Cate F; Firschke C; Lafitte S; Al-Saadi N; Kuntz-Hehner S; Horstick G; Greis C; Engelhardt M; Vanoverschelde JL; Becher H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 16386674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function.
    Krenning BJ; Kirschbaum SW; Soliman OI; Nemes A; van Geuns RJ; Vletter WB; Veltman CE; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR; Geleijnse ML
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 100(9):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17950813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of myocardial strain to assess global left ventricular function: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Brown J; Jenkins C; Marwick TH
    Am Heart J; 2009 Jan; 157(1):102.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19081404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT.
    Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Roffi M; Willmann JK; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
    Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 15088177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Hoffmann R; Barletta G; von Bardeleben S; Vanoverschelde JL; Kasprzak J; Greis C; Becher H
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 24440110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstructed versus real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jenkins C; Leano R; Chan J; Marwick TH
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Jul; 20(7):862-8. PubMed ID: 17617313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical ventricular remodeling for patients with clinically advanced congestive heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction.
    Patel ND; Barreiro CJ; Williams JA; Bonde PN; Waldron M; Natori S; Bluemke DA; Conte JV
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2202-10. PubMed ID: 16364872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac image modeling tool for quantitative analysis of global and regional cardiac wall motion.
    Hung J; Francois C; Nelson NA; Young A; Cowan BR; Jerecic R; Carr J
    Invest Radiol; 2009 May; 44(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 19346964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Annuar BR; Liew CK; Chin SP; Ong TK; Seyfarth MT; Chan WL; Fong YY; Ang CK; Lin N; Liew HB; Sim KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 17466480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of myocardial perfusion or myocardial function for detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. An echocardiographic multicenter comparison study using myocardial contrast echocardiography and 2D echocardiography.
    Hoffmann R; Borges AC; Kasprzak JD; von Bardeleben S; Firschke C; Greis C; Engelhardt M; Becher H; Vanoverschelde JL
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2007 Dec; 8(6):438-48. PubMed ID: 17011829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac MRI assessment of left and right ventricular parameters in healthy Australian normal volunteers.
    Teo KS; Carbone A; Piantadosi C; Chew DP; Hammett CJ; Brown MA; Worthley SG
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Aug; 17(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 18314390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain imaging for viability assessment in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Roes SD; Mollema SA; Lamb HJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A; Bax JJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 19616660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel two-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition for rapid automated ejection fraction.
    Cannesson M; Tanabe M; Suffoletto MS; McNamara DM; Madan S; Lacomis JM; Gorcsan J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 17222733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of myocardial infarct size assessed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and left ventricular function and volumes to predict mortality in patients with healed myocardial infarction.
    Roes SD; Kelle S; Kaandorp TA; Kokocinski T; Poldermans D; Lamb HJ; Boersma E; van der Wall EE; Fleck E; de Roos A; Nagel E; Bax JJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 100(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 17826372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction.
    Takenaka A; Iwase M; Sobue T; Yokota M
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 8596064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual estimation versus quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sievers B; Kirchberg S; Franken U; Puthenveettil BJ; Bakan A; Trappe HJ
    Am Heart J; 2005 Oct; 150(4):737-42. PubMed ID: 16209976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.