These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15618602)

  • 1. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
    Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
    Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
    Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
    Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?
    Fan B; Lu Y; Genant H; Fuerst T; Shepherd J
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1227-36. PubMed ID: 19859644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone density and body composition in newly licenced professional jockeys.
    Jackson KA; Sanchez-Santos MT; MacKinnon AL; Turner A; Kuznik K; Ellis S; Box C; Hill J; Javaid MK; Cooper C; Arden NK; Newton JL
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2675-2682. PubMed ID: 28612306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.
    Yu EW; Thomas BJ; Brown JK; Finkelstein JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Jan; 27(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 21915902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
    Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of single vs bilateral hip bone mineral density scans.
    White J; Harris SS; Dallal GE; Dawson-Hughes B
    J Clin Densitom; 2003; 6(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 12794238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements.
    Rajamanohara R; Robinson J; Rymer J; Patel R; Fogelman I; Blake GM
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 May; 22(5):1503-12. PubMed ID: 20700581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-Term Precision Error of Bone Strain Index, a New DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Software for Assessing Hip Strength.
    Messina C; Acquasanta M; Rinaudo L; Tortora S; Arena G; Albano D; Sconfienza LM; Ulivieri FM
    J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(2):330-337. PubMed ID: 33199190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.