These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1562106)

  • 21. Computational evaluation of intraventricular pressure gradients based on a fluid-structure approach.
    Redaelli A; Montevecchi FM
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Nov; 118(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 8950657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using a continuity equation].
    Dennig K; Kraus F; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 3817722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Realistic three-dimensional left ventricular ejection determined from computational fluid dynamics.
    Taylor TW; Yamaguchi T
    Med Eng Phys; 1995 Dec; 17(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 8564155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Ozkan A; Hachamovitch R; Kapadia SR; Tuzcu EM; Marwick TH
    Circulation; 2013 Aug; 128(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 23812184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The contractile mechanism as an approach to building left ventricular pump models.
    Negroni JA; Lascano EC; Barra JG; Crottogini AJ; Pichel RH
    Cardiovasc Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):1449-61. PubMed ID: 8221798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Left ventricular early inflow-outflow index: a novel echocardiographic indicator of mitral regurgitation severity.
    Lee MM; Salahuddin A; Garcia MJ; Spevack DM
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Jun; 4(6):e000781. PubMed ID: 26071032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Doppler-derived ejection intraventricular pressure gradients provide a reliable assessment of left ventricular systolic chamber function.
    Yotti R; Bermejo J; Desco MM; Antoranz JC; Rojo-Alvarez JL; Cortina C; Allué C; Rodríguez-Abella H; Moreno M; García-Fernández MA
    Circulation; 2005 Sep; 112(12):1771-9. PubMed ID: 16172285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In-vivo analysis of the instantaneous transvalvular pressure difference-flow relationship in aortic valve stenosis: implications of unsteady fluid-dynamics for the clinical assessment of disease severity.
    Bermejo J; Antoranz JC; Burwash IG; Alvarez JL; Moreno M; García-Fernández MA; Otto CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 12150306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of left ventricular function based on simulated systolic flow dynamics computed from regional wall motion.
    Schoephoerster RT; Silva CL; Ray G
    J Biomech; 1994 Feb; 27(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 8132680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of simultaneous alterations in preload and afterload on measurements of left ventricular contractility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: comparisons of ejection phase, isovolumetric and end-systolic force-velocity indexes.
    Borow KM; Neumann A; Marcus RH; Sareli P; Lang RM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 20(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 1527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of 4 different algorithms for the analysis of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography using a physical, dynamic 4-chamber cardiac phantom.
    De Bondt P; Claessens T; Rys B; De Winter O; Vandenberghe S; Segers P; Verdonck P; Dierckx RA
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 46(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 15632048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The left ventricular ejection effect.
    Danielsen M; Palladino JL; Mulier JP; Noordergraaf A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 71():13-28. PubMed ID: 10977595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of chamber geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients > 60 years of age with aortic stenosis.
    Aurigemma GP; Silver KH; McLaughlin M; Mauser J; Gaasch WH
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 74(8):794-8. PubMed ID: 7942552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation.
    Chafizadeh ER; Zoghbi WA
    Circulation; 1991 Jan; 83(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 1984881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.
    Parikh R; Goodman AL; Barr T; Sabik JF; Svensson LG; Rodriguez LL; Lytle BW; Grimm RA; Griffin BP; Desai MY
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):1558-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25869085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis.
    Badano L; Cassottano P; Bertoli D; Carratino L; Lucatti A; Spirito P
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 78(9):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8916482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Left-ventricular dynamic model based on constant ejection flow periods.
    Wijkstra H; Boom HB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Dec; 38(12):1204-12. PubMed ID: 1774082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Migration forces of transcatheter aortic valves in patients with noncalcific aortic insufficiency.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1227-33. PubMed ID: 19748632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel computational model for the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical valves in the opening phase.
    Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Mar; 229(3):232-44. PubMed ID: 25833999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanisms for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in aortic regurgitation: importance for predicting the functional response to aortic valve replacement.
    Starling MR; Kirsh MM; Montgomery DG; Gross MD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(4):887-97. PubMed ID: 1999625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.