These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15621330)

  • 1. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
    Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical segmental motion induced by shoulder abduction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Takasaki H; Hall T; Kaneko S; Iizawa T; Ikemoto Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):E122-6. PubMed ID: 19179912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tension and combined tension-extension structural response and tolerance properties of the human male ligamentous cervical spine.
    Dibb AT; Nightingale RW; Luck JF; Chancey VC; Fronheiser LE; Myers BS
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):081008. PubMed ID: 19604020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posteroanterior stiffness predicts sagittal plane midthoracic range of motion and three-dimensional flexibility in cadaveric spine segments.
    Sran MM; Khan KM; Zhu Q; Oxland TR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):806-12. PubMed ID: 15993525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation?
    McGregor AH; Wragg P; Gedroyc WM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Dec; 16(10):926-9. PubMed ID: 11733133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between changes in posteroanterior stiffness and active range of movement of the cervical spine following manual therapy treatment.
    Tuttle N; Barrett R; Laakso L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):E673-9. PubMed ID: 18758348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine.
    Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.
    Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Harrison DE; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16378668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    Physiotherapy; 2010 Jun; 96(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 20420958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
    DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gross range of motion in the cervical spine: the effects of osteopathic muscle energy technique in asymptomatic subjects.
    Burns DK; Wells MR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Mar; 106(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 16585381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of posteroanterior mobilisation on sagittal mobility of the lumbar spine.
    Petty NJ
    Man Ther; 1995 Nov; 1(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11327791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals.
    Grip H; Sundelin G; Gerdle B; Stefan Karlsson J
    J Biomech; 2008 Sep; 41(13):2799-805. PubMed ID: 18707689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cervical spine position, turning time, and cervical segment on cadaver intradiscal pressure during cervical spinal manipulative therapy.
    Wu LP; Huang YQ; Zhou WH; Manas D; Zhao WD; Chen JZ; Yin QS; Wang LH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):428-36. PubMed ID: 22921320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical spine posteroanterior stiffness differs with neck position.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rhodes HR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):829-34. PubMed ID: 22651962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.