231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15621643)
1. Evaluation of hydrodynamic drag on experimental fouling-release surfaces, using rotating disks.
Holm ER; Schultz MP; Haslbeck EG; Talbott WJ; Field AJ
Biofouling; 2004; 20(4-5):219-26. PubMed ID: 15621643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measurement of the drag characteristics of tin-free self-polishing co-polymers and fouling release coatings using a rotor apparatus.
Candries M; Atlar M; Mesbahi E; Pazouki K
Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():27-36. PubMed ID: 14618701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering.
Schultz MP
Biofouling; 2007; 23(5-6):331-41. PubMed ID: 17852068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ship hull fouling penalty.
Townsin RL
Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():9-15. PubMed ID: 14618699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings.
Schultz MP; Walker JM; Steppe CN; Flack KA
Biofouling; 2015; 31(9-10):759-73. PubMed ID: 26652667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating.
Hunsucker KZ; Vora GJ; Hunsucker JT; Gardner H; Leary DH; Kim S; Lin B; Swain G
Biofouling; 2018 Feb; 34(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 29347829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of hydrodynamic stress on the frictional drag of biofouling communities.
Hunsucker JT; Hunsucker KZ; Gardner H; Swain G
Biofouling; 2016 Nov; 32(10):1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27744722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies.
Valkirs AO; Seligman PF; Haslbeck E; Caso JS
Mar Pollut Bull; 2003 Jun; 46(6):763-79. PubMed ID: 12787585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating.
Hearin J; Hunsucker KZ; Swain G; Stephens A; Gardner H; Lieberman K; Harper M
Biofouling; 2015; 31(8):625-38. PubMed ID: 26359541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of 'in-service' conditions - mimicked hull roughness ranges and biofilms - on the surface and the hydrodynamic characteristics of foul-release type coatings.
Yeginbayeva IA; Atlar M; Turkmen S; Chen H
Biofouling; 2020 Oct; 36(9):1074-1089. PubMed ID: 33291985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elastomeric fluorinated polyurethane coatings for nontoxic fouling control.
Brady RF; Aronson CL
Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():59-62. PubMed ID: 14618705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three models to relate detachment of low form fouling at laboratory and ship scale.
Schultz MP; Finlay JA; Callow ME; Callow JA
Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():17-26. PubMed ID: 14618700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combinatorial materials research applied to the development of new surface coatings IV. A high-throughput bacterial biofilm retention and retraction assay for screening fouling-release performance of coatings.
Stafslien S; Daniels J; Mayo B; Christianson D; Chisholm B; Ekin A; Webster D; Swain G
Biofouling; 2007; 23(1-2):45-54. PubMed ID: 17453728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmentally benign sol-gel antifouling and foul-releasing coatings.
Detty MR; Ciriminna R; Bright FV; Pagliaro M
Acc Chem Res; 2014 Feb; 47(2):678-87. PubMed ID: 24397288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental investigation into the surface and hydrodynamic characteristics of marine coatings with mimicked hull roughness ranges.
Yeginbayeva IA; Atlar M
Biofouling; 2018 Oct; 34(9):1001-1019. PubMed ID: 30537869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of brushes for removal of fouling from fouling-release surfaces, using a hydraulic cleaning device.
Holm ER; Haslbeck EG; Horinek AA
Biofouling; 2003 Oct; 19(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 14650084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental study of drag resistance using a laboratory scale rotary set-up.
Weinell CE; Olsen KN; Christoffersen MW; Kiil S
Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():45-51. PubMed ID: 14618703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship.
Schultz MP; Bendick JA; Holm ER; Hertel WM
Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 21161774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of proactive in-water grooming to improve the performance of ship hull antifouling coatings.
Tribou M; Swain G
Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 20390556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag.
Snowdon AA; Dennington SP; Longyear JE; Wharton JA; Stoodley P
Soft Matter; 2023 May; 19(20):3675-3687. PubMed ID: 37170818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
