BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15623056)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
    Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stress analysis of the staggered and straight placement of implants in the mandibular posterior region under the localized load].
    Li Y; Zhou YM; Zhou ZP; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 17888256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 69.