These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1562402)

  • 1. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Arnadóttir E; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Lundin A; Lyttkens K; Kheddache K; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.
    Lyttkens K; Kehler M; Andersson B; Carlsen S; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Strömbäck A
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8369178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of inverted digital luminescence radiography in evaluating chest neoplasms.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Hochbergs P; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Lönntoft M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Nov; 32(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 1742124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Findings of digital intensive or bed lung radiographs at the monitor vs. hard copy: a clinical ROC study].
    Pärtan G; Mosser H; Tekusch A; Urban M; Augustin I; Hruby W
    Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 7948983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The value of the supine chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography in relation to the experience of the observer. A ROC analysis in CT-validated cases].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Strayle M; Linstedt-Hilden M; Dietz K; Deusch H; Hoffmann W; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8043760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside chest radiography using digital luminescence. A comparison between digital radiographs reviewed on a personal computer and as hard-copies.
    Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Kehler M; Lindberg L
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 1389649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic capability of digital radiography of the chest using scanning laser stimulated luminescence].
    Onitsuka H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 49(2):177-90. PubMed ID: 2755785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The lateral thoracic radiograph in the intensive care unit using digital luminescence radiography].
    Witte G; Bause HW; Maas R; Pothman W; Schwermer B; Nicolas V
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):417-20. PubMed ID: 2160101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
    Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.