These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15626131)

  • 1. [Full crown preparation of a vital tooth is outdated].
    Keizer SP; van Pelt AW
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Nov; 111(11):435-41. PubMed ID: 15626131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation.
    Edelhoff D; Ozcan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():193-204. PubMed ID: 17594382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of metal- and galvano-ceramic crowns cemented with different luting cements: in vitro comparative study.
    Ghazy MH; Madina MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):610-2. PubMed ID: 17165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Crown and laminate preparations. Standard preparations for esthetic ceramic crowns and ceramic veneers].
    Lehner CR; Margolin MD; Schärer P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(12):1560-75. PubMed ID: 8553041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of two self-adhesive cements on marginal adaptation and strength of esthetic ceramic CAD/CAM molar crowns.
    Mörmann W; Wolf D; Ender A; Bindl A; Göhring T; Attin T
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 19432763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality.
    Strassler HE
    Gen Dent; 2007 Nov; 55(7):686-94; quiz 695-6, 712. PubMed ID: 18069513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the effect of a sloping shoulder and a shoulder bevel on the marginal integrity of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) veneer crowns.
    Jalalian E; Jannati H; Mirzaei M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 18264521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation.
    Good ML; Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 19013703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anterior all-ceramic crown: a rationale for the choice of ceramic and cement.
    Mizrahi B
    Br Dent J; 2008 Sep; 205(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 18791580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The full veneer as an alternative to the full crown.
    Crispin BJ
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1997; 4():6-10. PubMed ID: 9663043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive dentistry: paradigm shifts in preparation design.
    LeSage BP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):97-101; quiz 102, 116. PubMed ID: 19583167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complete esthetic and functional rehabilitation with adhesively luted all-ceramic restorations--case report over 4.5 years.
    Groten M
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Oct; 38(9):723-31. PubMed ID: 17873979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of porcelain veneers, crowns and an implant to resolve an esthetic problem.
    El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 74(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 19202650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.