These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15626985)

  • 21. Effect of spinal level and loading conditions on the production of vertebral burst fractures in a porcine model.
    Boisclair D; Mac-Thiong JM; Parent S; Petit Y
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Sep; 133(9):094503. PubMed ID: 22010749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.
    Melton LJ; Riggs BL; Keaveny TM; Achenbach SJ; Hoffmann PF; Camp JJ; Rouleau PA; Bouxsein ML; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Robb RA; Khosla S
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1885-92. PubMed ID: 17680721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
    Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lumbar spine mechanical response to axial compression load in vivo.
    Wisleder D; Smith MB; Mosher TJ; Zatsiorsky V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):E403-9. PubMed ID: 11547210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanism of the burst fracture in the thoracolumbar spine. The effect of loading rate.
    Tran NT; Watson NA; Tencer AF; Ching RP; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):1984-8. PubMed ID: 8578372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metastatic burst fracture risk assessment based on complex loading of the thoracic spine.
    Tschirhart CE; Finkelstein JA; Whyne CM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 34(3):494-505. PubMed ID: 16482411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative, 3D Visualization of the Initiation and Progression of Vertebral Fractures Under Compression and Anterior Flexion.
    Jackman TM; Hussein AI; Curtiss C; Fein PM; Camp A; De Barros L; Morgan EF
    J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Apr; 31(4):777-88. PubMed ID: 26590372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element analysis of the influence of loading rate on a model of the full lumbar spine under dynamic loading conditions.
    Wagnac E; Arnoux PJ; Garo A; Aubin CE
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2012 Sep; 50(9):903-15. PubMed ID: 22566121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical effects of the body augmenter for reconstruction of the vertebral body.
    Chen HH; Wang WK; Li KC; Chen TH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(18):E382-7. PubMed ID: 15371717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine sustained by soldiers in vehicles attacked by improvised explosive devices.
    Ragel BT; Allred CD; Brevard S; Davis RT; Frank EH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2400-5. PubMed ID: 19789468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Limited usefulness of traction-compression films in the radiographic diagnosis of lumbar spinal instability. Comparison with flexion-extension films.
    Pitkänen M; Manninen HI; Lindgrer KA; Turunen M; Airaksinen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 9122800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.
    Briggs AM; Wrigley TV; van Dieën JH; Phillips B; Lo SK; Greig AM; Bennell KL
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1785-95. PubMed ID: 16819622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method to study lumbar spine response to axial compression during magnetic resonance imaging: technical note.
    Wisleder D; Werner SL; Kraemer WJ; Fleck SJ; Zatsiorsky VM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):E416-20. PubMed ID: 11547212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The contribution of load magnitude and number of load cycles to cumulative low-back load estimations: a study based on in-vitro compression data.
    Coenen P; Kingma I; Boot CR; Bongers PM; van Dieën JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Dec; 27(10):1083-6. PubMed ID: 22877832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flexion-extension response of the thoracolumbar spine under compressive follower preload.
    Stanley SK; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Paxinos O; Carandang G; Zindrick MR; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):E510-4. PubMed ID: 15543052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adjacent level load transfer following vertebral augmentation in the cadaveric spine.
    Kayanja MM; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):E790-7. PubMed ID: 17023840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A modeling capacity of vertebral fractures exists during growth: an up-to-47-year follow-up.
    Karlsson MK; Moller A; Hasserius R; Besjakov J; Karlsson C; Ohlin A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2087-92. PubMed ID: 14501919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radio-translucent 3-axis mechanical testing rig for the spine in micro-CT.
    Si-Hoe KM; Teoh SH; Teo J
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 17154698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of repetitive flexion and extension fatigue loading on the young porcine lumbar spine, a feasibility study of MRI and histological analyses.
    Thoreson O; Ekström L; Hansson HA; Todd C; Witwit W; Swärd Aminoff A; Jonasson P; Baranto A
    J Exp Orthop; 2017 Dec; 4(1):16. PubMed ID: 28500483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.