These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15628528)
1. [Effect of delay of blood cultures on positive detection by automated blood culture system]. Kobayashi I; Yamamoto M; Hasegawa M; Sato Y; Uchino U; Kaneko A Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 78(11):959-66. PubMed ID: 15628528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics. Flayhart D; Borek AP; Wakefield T; Dick J; Carroll KC J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):816-21. PubMed ID: 17166960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates. Dunne WM; Case LK; Isgriggs L; Lublin DM Transfusion; 2005 Jul; 45(7):1138-42. PubMed ID: 15987359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can BacT/Alert FA and FN blood culture bottles increase the recovery of microorganisms in the clinical laboratory? Saito T; Iinuma Y; Takakura S; Fujihara N; Kudo T; Ichiyama S J Infect Chemother; 2004 Dec; 10(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 15614459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of 4 different supplements and 5 blood culture bottles types in detection of bacteria and Candida spp. in simulated sterile body fluid cultures. Nylén T; Saeedi B; Borg C; Ullberg M; Özenci V Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Sep; 77(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 23867327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. Klaerner HG; Eschenbach U; Kamereck K; Lehn N; Wagner H; Miethke T J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Mar; 38(3):1036-41. PubMed ID: 10698992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated blood culture systems for candida growth detection. Horvath LL; George BJ; Murray CK; Harrison LS; Hospenthal DR J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 14715740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization. Chung Y; Kim IH; Han M; Kim HS; Kim HS; Song W; Kim JS Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31375943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Menchinelli G; Liotti FM; Fiori B; De Angelis G; D'Inzeo T; Giordano L; Posteraro B; Sabbatucci M; Sanguinetti M; Spanu T Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():221. PubMed ID: 30837964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of BacT/ALERT 3D and BACTEC systems for the recovery of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. Jamal W; Tamaray G; Pazhoor A; Rotimi VO Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16651840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of BACTEC and BacT/ALERT systems in evaluation of blood cultures]. Ardiç N; Ilga U; Ozyurt M; Haznedaroğlu T Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004 Oct; 38(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 15700666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the detection of anaerobic bacteria in haemoculture systems BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic and BacT/Alert FN Anaerobic]. Cermák P; Förstl M Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2005 Jun; 11(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 16025428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recovery of Gram-Negative Bacteria from Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles Containing Antibiotic Binding Resins after Exposure to β-Lactam and Fluoroquinolone Concentrations. Chen IH; Nicolau DP; Kuti JL J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 31340990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Growth and detection of aerobic bacterial pathogens in BacT/Alert FA, BacT/Alert SA, Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and Bactec Standard Aerobic/F]. Cermák P; Sedláková P; Mejstríková L; Mazurová J Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2006 Aug; 12(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 16958021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Laboratory-based evaluation of significance to routinely use anaerobic blood culture bottles: analysis of positivity and rapidity to detect positive cultures]. Tamayose MH; Yamane N; Kisanuki K; Kawai M; Nakasone I Rinsho Byori; 2009 Dec; 57(12):1145-50. PubMed ID: 20077812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis. Klingspor L; Muhammed SA; Ozenci V Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Nov; 31(11):2983-7. PubMed ID: 22669561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the effect of delayed entry into 2 different blood culture systems (BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D) on culture positivity. Akan OA; Yildiz E Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 16427242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures. Chen JR; Lee SY; Yang BH; Lu JJ J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Jun; 41(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18629422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]