These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15629160)

  • 1. Reviewing reviewers.
    Kay S
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Jan; 58(1):1. PubMed ID: 15629160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012].
    Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J
    Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: does it work?
    Nahai F
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In praise of reviewers.
    Fulton JS
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(5):215-7. PubMed ID: 22649839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewing the correspondence section in the Saudi Medical Journal 2000-2004.
    Afifi M
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Jun; 27(6):908-10. PubMed ID: 16758067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What's a peer reviewed journal?
    Guerrieri R
    Nurs Manage; 2012 Aug; 43(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 22846700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The peer review process: a primer for
    Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quest for excellence (part 2): reviewing a clinical trial for the British Journal of Dermatology.
    Ingram JR
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Dec; 171(6):1277-8. PubMed ID: 25523245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Journal's peer-review process.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Sep; 321(12):837-9. PubMed ID: 2770821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can CCR do for you?
    Potash J; Anderson KC
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Support for peer review.
    Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
    McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
    Roy-Byrne PP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review.
    Mucci B
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Jan; 67(1):89. PubMed ID: 22114949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process.
    de Hon F; Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.