147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15629296)
1. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria.
Boden C; Blumenthal EZ; Pascual J; McEwan G; Weinreb RN; Medeiros F; Sample PA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):1029-36. PubMed ID: 15629296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relation between intraocular pressure peak in the water drinking test and visual field progression in glaucoma.
Susanna R; Vessani RM; Sakata L; Zacarias LC; Hatanaka M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 89(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 16170120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Hutchison DM; LeBlanc RP; Artes PH; Nicolela MT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 89(8):1008-12. PubMed ID: 16024855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of dorzolamide 2% added to timolol maleate 0.5% on intraocular pressure, retrobulbar blood flow, and the progression of visual field damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center, 4-year, open-label study.
Martínez A; Sánchez M
Clin Ther; 2008 Jun; 30(6):1120-34. PubMed ID: 18640468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the pattern- and total deviation-based Glaucoma Change Probability programs.
Katz J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Apr; 41(5):1012-6. PubMed ID: 10752935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma patients with asymmetric hemifield visual field loss.
Badlani V; Shahidi M; Shakoor A; Edward DP; Zelkha R; Wilensky J
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16865002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience.
Koucheki B; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Patel G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):1022-8. PubMed ID: 15629295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS) study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.
Krupin T; Liebmann JM; Greenfield DS; Rosenberg LF; Ritch R; Yang JW;
Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 15745762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term survival of central visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
Much JW; Liu C; Piltz-Seymour JR
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1162-6. PubMed ID: 18067965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population.
Casas-Llera P; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Arnalich-Montiel F; Pérez-López M; Fernández-Buenaga R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 93(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19535357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 18078852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
Caprioli J; Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
