These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15629296)
41. Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry. Sihota R; Gupta V; Tuli D; Sharma A; Sony P; Srinivasan G J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17224765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Visual field defects in children with congenital glaucoma. de Souza EC; Berezovsky A; Morales PH; de Arruda Mello PA; de Oliveira Bonomo PP; Salomão SR J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 11020107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma. Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects. Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Predictive factors for progressive optic nerve damage in various types of chronic open-angle glaucoma. Martus P; Stroux A; Budde WM; Mardin CY; Korth M; Jonas JB Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 139(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 15953429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities. Manassakorn A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Koucheki B; Law SK; Caprioli J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2896-903. PubMed ID: 16799031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Standardized visual field assessment for patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. Gordon LK; Goldhardt R; Holland GN; Yu F; Levinson RD Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2006 Dec; 14(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 17162602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of the assessment method on the incidence of visual field progression in glaucoma: a network meta-analysis. Ernest PJ; Viechtbauer W; Schouten JS; Beckers HJ; Hendrikse F; Prins MH; Webers CA Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 20942855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Bengtsson B; Leske MC; Hyman L; Heijl A; Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17097736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT. Horn FK; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Baleanu D; Juenemann AM; Kruse FE; Tornow RP Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):1971-7. PubMed ID: 19151389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients. Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma. Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Vesti E; Johnson CA; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):3873-9. PubMed ID: 12939303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Appearance of the pattern deviation map as a function of change in area of localized field loss. Asman P; Wild JM; Heijl A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3099-106. PubMed ID: 15326126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Glaucoma perimetry--optimization of test point patterns with an information index]. Weber J; Kosel J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Aug; 189(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 3761987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Fluctuations of visual field interpretation related to cluster and scotoma analysis by one interpreter. Fankhauser F 1st ; Fankhauser F; Larsen SE; Cruz-Orive LM Ger J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jan; 3(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8142880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma. Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4346-51. PubMed ID: 15557442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]