These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15629488)

  • 61. Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: an event-related potential study of the word superiority effect.
    Martin CD; Nazir T; Thierry G; Paulignan Y; Démonet JF
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16774747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition.
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Barber H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1803-17. PubMed ID: 16269115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Lexical properties of the Boston Naming Test stimuli: age differences in word naming and lexical decision latency.
    Moberg M; Ferraro FR; Petros TV
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2000; 7(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 11125708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Homophone effects in lexical decision.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 11204094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The left fusiform area is affected by written frequency of words.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Adorni R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2292-9. PubMed ID: 18485421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The nature of the syllabic neighbourhood effect in French.
    Mathey S; Zagar D; Doignon N; Seigneuric A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 16620742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The KEY to the ROCK: near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition.
    Ota M; Hartsuiker RJ; Haywood SL
    Cognition; 2009 May; 111(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 19230869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Pre-lexical disorders in repetition conduction aphasia.
    Sidiropoulos K; de Bleser R; Ackermann H; Preilowski B
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Dec; 46(14):3225-38. PubMed ID: 18761023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes.
    Foulsham T; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1707-28. PubMed ID: 23398283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The role of selected lexical factors on confrontation naming accuracy, speed, and fluency in adults who do and do not stutter.
    Newman RS; Bernstein Ratner N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):196-213. PubMed ID: 17344559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.