These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15629827)
1. A comparison of 2 methods for estimating residual stromal bed thickness before repeat LASIK. Randleman JB; Hewitt SM; Lynn MJ; Stulting RD Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15629827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement. Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of residual stromal bed and flap thickness in primary and repeat laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic patients. Das S; Sullivan LJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2080-4. PubMed ID: 17137987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome. Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Randleman JB; Russell B; Ward MA; Thompson KP; Stulting RD Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 12578766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia. Ivarsen A; Fledelius W; Hjortdal JØ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):2061-6. PubMed ID: 19151379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia. Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome. Muallem MS; Yoo SY; Romano AC; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1902-8. PubMed ID: 15342053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence, management, and visual outcomes of buttonholed laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Al-Obeidan S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 19393882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of flap thickness reproducibility using microkeratomes with a second motor for advancement. Miranda D; Smith SD; Krueger RR Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1931-4. PubMed ID: 14522767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK. Jin GJ; Merkley KH Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confocal microscopy evaluation of stromal ablation depth after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Erie JC; Hodge DO; Bourne WM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 15030819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]