These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15630398)

  • 1. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction.
    Cooper J; Citek K; Feldman JM
    Optometry; 2011 Apr; 82(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 21439490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?".
    Borish IM; Catania LJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor.
    VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Macular illumination tests in various refractive states of the eye.
    Paul SD; Singh K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1971 Sep; 19(3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15744979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control and consideration of wavefront aberrometers.
    Montés-Micó R; Muñoz G; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):942. PubMed ID: 15130619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of accuracy of refraction measurement in children up to the age of 15 years using the PowerRef II and by standard techniques].
    Osmera J; Korynta J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2005 May; 61(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15981493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral refraction measurement: does it matter if one turns the eye or the head?
    Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 18201338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of wavefront sensing devices.
    Solomon KD; Fernández de Castro LE; Sandoval HP; Vroman DT
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2004 Jun; 17(2):119-27, v. PubMed ID: 15207555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical ocular wavefront analyzers.
    Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montes-Mico R; Bates K
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):603-16. PubMed ID: 17598581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between focometer and autorefractor in the measurement of refractive error among students in underserved community of sub-Saharan Africa.
    Aina AS; Oluleye TS; Olusanya BA
    Eye (Lond); 2016 Nov; 30(11):1496-1501. PubMed ID: 27518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-order aberrations in pseudophakia with different IOLs.
    Cheng AC; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):867; author reply 867-8. PubMed ID: 15975439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor.
    Beverage JL; Schwiegerling J
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9):932-7. PubMed ID: 17124892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic photorefraction system: an offline application for the dynamic analysis of ocular focus and pupil size from photorefraction images.
    Suryakumar R; Kwok D; Fernandez S; Bobier WR
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Mar; 39(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19217087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Introduction to the topic: instrument-based anterior chamber diagnosis].
    Auffarth GU
    Ophthalmologe; 2008 Sep; 105(9):809. PubMed ID: 18726103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.