BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15630406)

  • 1. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the Sphere Value Measured by an Autorefractor Reliable in Children under Cycloplegia? Comparison with Streak Retinoscopy.
    Da Gama RD; Nom TY; Da Costa DC; Dos Santos JC; Da Costa RS; Relha C
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 24372417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
    Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.
    Schaeffel F; Mathis U; Brüggemann G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):630-9. PubMed ID: 17632312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor.
    Dahlmann-Noor AH; Comyn O; Kostakis V; Misra A; Gupta N; Heath J; Brown J; Iron A; McGill S; Vrotsou K; Vivian AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 93(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 19001013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of open-field autorefraction, closed-field autorefraction, and retinoscopy for refractive measurements of children and adolescents in Taiwan.
    Kuo YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Aug; 119(8):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 32354691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.