These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15631597)

  • 1. Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: comment on Kareev (2000).
    Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):256-67; discussion 280-5. PubMed ID: 15631597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size and the detection of correlation--a signal detection account: comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005).
    Anderson RB; Doherty ME; Berg ND; Friedrich JC
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):268-79; discussion 280-5. PubMed ID: 15631599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: when are they successful?
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):966-82. PubMed ID: 16938040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size and correlational inference.
    Anderson RB; Doherty ME; Friedrich JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):929-44. PubMed ID: 18605879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007).
    Parks CM; Yonelinas AP
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):188-202; discussion 203-9. PubMed ID: 17227187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small samples do not cause greater accuracy--but clear data may cause small samples: comment on Fiedler and Kareev (2006).
    Evans L; Buehner MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):792-9. PubMed ID: 21299329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of working memory capacity limitations on the intuitive assessment of correlation: amplification, attenuation, or both?
    Cahan S; Mor Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):438-42. PubMed ID: 17352623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision quality (always) increases with the size of information samples-provided that the decision rule is statistically valid: comment on Fiedler and Kareev (2006).
    Cahan S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):829-41. PubMed ID: 20438280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory and intelligence--their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).
    Oberauer K; Schulze R; Wilhelm O; Süss HM
    Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 131(1):61-5; author reply 72-5. PubMed ID: 15631551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dysfunctional implications of narrow window theory: variability in the intuitive assessment of correlation.
    Cahan S; Mor Y
    Cognition; 2007 Oct; 105(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 17055470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):104-32. PubMed ID: 17227183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004).
    Busemeyer JR; Townsend JT; Diederich A; Barkan R
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):253-5. PubMed ID: 15631596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple effect size indicator for two-group comparisons? A comment on r equivalent.
    Kraemer HC
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16392996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.
    Shrout PE; Bolger N
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Dec; 7(4):422-45. PubMed ID: 12530702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 18778150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.