These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Reform of nursing care modalities regarding restraint, routine care or abrogation of the 1990 law?]. Rivallan A Soins Psychiatr; 2001 Sep; (216):8-9. PubMed ID: 11949454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Case law and clinical considerations involving physical restraint and seclusion for institutionalized persons with mental disabilities. Coffin CL Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1999; 23(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 10506820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic psychiatric evaluation of workers' compensation claims in a managed-care context. Bursztajn HJ; Paul RK; Reiss DM; Hamm RM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 12817853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The latest best practice guidelines relating to seclusion and restraint]. Alezrah C; Lafont M; Bouet R; Depaigne-Loth A; Paindavoine C; Laurence M; Rodde-Dunet MH; Senon JL Soins Psychiatr; 2018; 39(317):16-19. PubMed ID: 30047452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal issues in maximum security institutions for people with mental illness: liberty, security, and administrative discretion. Petrila J; Douglas KS Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(5):463-80. PubMed ID: 12239706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bursztajn et al. offer two composite case vignettes of lost compensation claims. Schoenholtz JC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):395-6; author reply 396-8. PubMed ID: 14584543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. a case vignette study in 16 European countries. Steinert T; Lepping P Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18455912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seclusion and restraint: leaders are still polarized. Dialogue. Riordan CE; Ross EC; Covall M; del Vecchio P; Daniels GB; Curie C Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 2000 Jun; 9(3):29-37. PubMed ID: 11067278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Seclusion and restraint: Congress reacts to reports of abuse. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jul; 50(7):881-2, 885. PubMed ID: 10402606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Seclusion & restraint. Understanding recent changes. Kozub ML; Skidmore R J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2001 Mar; 39(3):24-31. PubMed ID: 11281072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The circumstances of using physical restraint in psychiatric services]. Baranowski P; Pawłowski T Psychiatr Pol; 2006; 40(4):657-69. PubMed ID: 17068939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Law & psychiatry: psychiatric advance directives and the treatment of committed patients. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2004 Jul; 55(7):751-2, 763. PubMed ID: 15232012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legislation to regulate use of restraints and seclusion in mental health facilities introduced in Congress. Psychiatr Serv; 1999 May; 50(5):715-6. PubMed ID: 10332916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The trust that challenged physical restraint. Vere-Jones E Nurs Times; 2007 Oct 23-29; 103(43):20-1. PubMed ID: 17993113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Australian mental health: time for an urgent reappraisal. Hundertmark JD Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006; 40(6-7):606. PubMed ID: 16756593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter to the editor in response to "Is it time for international guidelines on physical restraint in psychiatric patients?". Cioffi A; Tomassini L Clin Ter; 2019; 170(2):e108-e109. PubMed ID: 30993306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]