365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15633319)
1. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative histologic analysis of coronally advanced flap with and without collagen membrane for root coverage.
Lee EJ; Meraw SJ; Oh TJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 12146538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance.
Kimble KM; Eber RM; Soehren S; Shyr Y; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 15068108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage: meta-analysis.
Al-Hamdan K; Eber R; Sarment D; Kowalski C; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1520-33. PubMed ID: 14653400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane.
Shieh AT; Wang HL; O'Neal R; Glickman GN; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 9287069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative.
Andrade PF; Grisi MF; Marcaccini AM; Fernandes PG; Reino DM; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Novaes AB
J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20583919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession.
Cueva MA; Boltchi FE; Hallmon WW; Nunn ME; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Rees T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):949-56. PubMed ID: 15341352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (P-15) in the treatment isolated Class I gingival recession of defects: a pilot study.
Nazareth CA; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):700-7. PubMed ID: 21080787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part II: secondary outcomes.
Meyle J; Gonzales JR; Bödeker RH; Hoffmann T; Richter S; Heinz B; Arjomand M; Reich E; Sculean A; Jepsen K; Jepsen S
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1188-95. PubMed ID: 15515332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
