261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15633377)
1. Bonding and debonding characteristics of APC-plus clarity brackets compared to APC clarity brackets.
Staribratova-Reister K; Jost-Brinkmann PG
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 15633377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets.
Kitahara-Céia FM; Mucha JN; Marques dos Santos PA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 18929273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
Amditis C
Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heat generated by residual adhesive removal after debonding of brackets.
Jonke E; Weiland F; Freudenthaler JW; Bantleon HP
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 17190228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct bonding with precoated brackets and self-etching primers.
Vicente A; Bravo LA
Am J Dent; 2006 Aug; 19(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16939031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
Al Shamsi AH; Cunningham JL; Lamey PJ; Lynch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):301.e9-15. PubMed ID: 17346580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product.
Grünheid T; Sudit GN; Larson BE
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 25548144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bond strengths and adhesive remnant index of self-etching adhesives used to bond brackets to instrumented and uninstrumented enamel.
Ritter DE; Ritter AV; Bruggeman G; Locks A; Tulloch JF
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16555658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
Sernetz F; Kraut J
J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
