261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15633377)
41. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
Fox NA; McCabe JF
Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Adhesive performance of precoated brackets after expiration.
Cloud CC; Trojan TM; Suliman SN; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 26172317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets.
Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.
Azzeh E; Feldon PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 12532067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding.
Radlanski RJ
J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Jul; 62(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11508106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications.
Bishara SE; Trulove TS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 2206042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing.
Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15681012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A pilot study for evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel using a new impact test machine.
Hendry RE; Gilgrass T; Chung L; MacPherson R; Yang TH; Reuben RL
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():103-11. PubMed ID: 18376018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets.
Kraut J; Radin S; Trowbridge HI; Emling RC; Yankell SL
J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 1812905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Self-etching primer and a non-rinse conditioner versus phosphoric acid: alternative methods for bonding brackets.
Vicente A; Bravo LA; Romero M
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 16428256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The use of a flowable ormocer for bonding brackets.
Vicente A; Bravo LA
Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 17993024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives.
Trakyali G; Ozdemir FI; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 19460855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
Vicente A; Bravo LA; Romero M; Ortíz AJ; Canteras M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):390-5. PubMed ID: 16527635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Orthodontic bracket bonding: enamel bond strength vs time.
Yamamoto A; Yoshida T; Tsubota K; Takamizawa T; Kurokawa H; Miyazaki M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):435.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17045138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
