These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15634017)

  • 1. Hit-directed nearest-neighbor searching.
    Shanmugasundaram V; Maggiora GM; Lajiness MS
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jan; 48(1):240-8. PubMed ID: 15634017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similarity searching and scaffold hopping in synthetically accessible combinatorial chemistry spaces.
    Boehm M; Wu TY; Claussen H; Lemmen C
    J Med Chem; 2008 Apr; 51(8):2468-80. PubMed ID: 18380426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient exploration of large combinatorial chemistry spaces by monomer-based similarity searching.
    Yu N; Bakken GA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):745-55. PubMed ID: 19309177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2D fingerprint methods for multiple-template similarity searching on compound activity classes of increasing structural diversity.
    Tovar A; Eckert H; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Feb; 2(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plate-based diversity selection based on empirical HTS data to enhance the number of hits and their chemical diversity.
    Sukuru SC; Jenkins JL; Beckwith RE; Scheiber J; Bender A; Mikhailov D; Davies JW; Glick M
    J Biomol Screen; 2009 Jul; 14(6):690-9. PubMed ID: 19531667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction and recombination of fingerprints of different design increase compound recall and the structural diversity of hits.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Feb; 75(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 20028390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PowerMV: a software environment for molecular viewing, descriptor generation, data analysis and hit evaluation.
    Liu K; Feng J; Young SS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15807517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Ewing T; Baber JC; Feher M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17125184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of data fusion methods in virtual screening: similarity and group fusion.
    Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Loesel J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17125165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying promising compounds in drug discovery: genetic algorithms and some new statistical techniques.
    Mandal A; Johnson K; Wu CF; Bornemeier D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):981-8. PubMed ID: 17425300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases.
    Medina-Franco JL; Maggiora GM; Giulianotti MA; Pinilla C; Houghten RA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17927720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian screening for active compounds in high-dimensional chemical spaces combining property descriptors and molecular fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jan; 71(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18069988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A knowledge-based weighting approach to ligand-based virtual screening.
    Stiefl N; Zaliani A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 16562987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced HTS hit selection via a local hit rate analysis.
    Posner BA; Xi H; Mills JE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2202-10. PubMed ID: 19795815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mass spectrometric techniques for label-free high-throughput screening in drug discovery.
    Roddy TP; Horvath CR; Stout SJ; Kenney KL; Ho PI; Zhang JH; Vickers C; Kaushik V; Hubbard B; Wang YK
    Anal Chem; 2007 Nov; 79(21):8207-13. PubMed ID: 17902631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A kinase-focused compound collection: compilation and screening strategy.
    Sun D; Chuaqui C; Deng Z; Bowes S; Chin D; Singh J; Cullen P; Hankins G; Lee WC; Donnelly J; Friedman J; Josiah S
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 Jun; 67(6):385-94. PubMed ID: 16882313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIPALSTREE: a new hierarchical clustering approach for large compound libraries and its application to virtual screening.
    Böcker A; Schneider G; Teckentrup A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2220-9. PubMed ID: 17125166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.