These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1563426)

  • 21. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Barium sulfate for abdominal computer assisted tomography.
    Hatfield KD; Segal SD; Tait K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Aug; 4(4):570. PubMed ID: 7391310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The use of contrast medium in the diagnosis of small intestine occlusion (author's transl)].
    Benendo-Kapuścińska B; Przybylska E
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1980; 44(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7255233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new barium paste for computed tomography of the esophagus.
    Cayea PD; Seltzer SE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 3968273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is administration of enteric contrast material safe before abdominal CT in children who require sedation? Experience with chloral hydrate and pentobarbital.
    Ziegler MA; Fricke BL; Donnelly LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 12490468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
    Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re: depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
    Kennish SJ; Tolan DJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):551; author reply 551. PubMed ID: 18684579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Picture quality, tolerance, acceptance and longevity of a barium sulfate suspension (Micropaque CT) as an oral intestinal contrast medium for abdominal computed tomography].
    Müller RD; Buddenbrock B
    Rontgenpraxis; 1992 Oct; 45(10):349-55. PubMed ID: 1440063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Iododerma after computed tomographic scan with intravenous radiopaque contrast media.
    Chang MW; Miner JE; Moiin A; Hashimoto K
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Jun; 36(6 Pt 1):1014-6. PubMed ID: 9204072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. E-Z-CAT. An oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen.
    Nyman U; Dinnetz G; Andersson I
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 6731015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A new contrast medium for bowel opacification in abdominal CT scans--with comparative studies on water-soluble iodinated contrast and on fat emulsion].
    Sako M; Hasegawa M; Watanabe H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jan; 44(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 6739282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Barium sulphate allergy (case report)].
    Tarhan S; Yilmaz G; Serter S; Göktan C
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 15470617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of low-energy CT imaging on selection of positive oral contrast media concentration.
    Patino M; Murcia DJ; Iamurri AP; Kambadakone AR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 27933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast agent.
    Marik PE; Patel SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1623-4. PubMed ID: 9168750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
    Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peripheral blood eosinophilia associated with gastrointestinal administration of iodinated contrast media.
    Plavsic BM; Newman AC; Reuther WL; Terry JA; Drnovsek VH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Mar; 180(3):751-3. PubMed ID: 12591690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation.
    Antoch G; Kuehl H; Kanja J; Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Hauth E; Jentzen W; Beyer T; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 14764889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media.
    Ramsay DW; Markham DH; Morgan B; Rodgers PM; Liddicoat AJ
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Aug; 56(8):670-3. PubMed ID: 11467870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anaphylactoid reactions with gastrointestinal contrast media.
    Skucas J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):962-4. PubMed ID: 9124150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.