These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1563473)

  • 1. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of attritive diet on craniofacial morphology: a cephalometric analysis of a Finnish skull sample.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 2190843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of the masticatory hypofunction on the craniofacial growth and development in rats.
    Ulgen M; Baran S; Kaya H; Karadede I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 9057619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphology and growth in the ferret: effects from alteration of masticatory function.
    He T
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2004; (165):1-72. PubMed ID: 15224640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology.
    van Spronsen PH; Koolstra JH; van Ginkel FC; Weijs WA; Valk J; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):313-28. PubMed ID: 9239960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masticatory muscle function and craniofacial morphology. An experimental study in the growing rat fed a soft diet.
    Kiliaridis S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 36():1-55. PubMed ID: 3465055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relation of the glenoid fossa to craniofacial morphology, studied on dry human skulls.
    Pirttiniemi P; Kantomaa T; Rönning O
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 2288207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between dimensions of muscles of mastication (masseter and lateral pterygoid) and skeletal dimensions: study of 40 cases.
    Azaroual MF; Fikri M; Abouqal R; Benyahya H; Zaoui F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 24156908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
    Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas.
    Mehta OP; Gupta DS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 18923224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed longitudinal anthropometric study of craniofacial growth of Colombian mestizos 6-17 years of age.
    Arboleda C; Buschang PH; Camacho JA; Botero P; Roldan S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 21097992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology.
    Showfety KJ; Vig PS; Matteson S; Phillips C
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 3473953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors of human skeletal craniofacial morphology.
    Liebgott B
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jul; 47(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 268953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.