189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15635829)
1. A study on the clinical usefulness of digitalized random-dot stereoacuity test.
Yang JW; Son MH; Yun IH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 15635829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
Fawcett SL; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
Fawcett SL
J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. ALSPAC "Children in Focus" Study Team.
Birch E; Williams C; Hunter J; Lapa MC
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1997; 34(4):217-22; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 9253735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
Fawcett SL; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of stereoacuity outcomes at ages 1 to 24 months: Randot Stereocards.
Birch EE; Morale SE; Jeffrey BG; O'Connor AR; Fawcett SL
J AAPOS; 2005 Feb; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15729278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic reliability and normative values of stereoacuity tests in preschool-aged children.
Afsari S; Rose KA; Pai AS; Gole GA; Leone JF; Burlutsky G; Mitchell P
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 97(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 23292927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
Leske DA; Holmes JM
J AAPOS; 2004 Feb; 8(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14970796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Borish Vectographic Nearpoint Card II contour and random dot stereoacuity in children.
Kulp MT
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 10955543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
Webber AL; Wood JM; Thompson B; Birch EE
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30628744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical evaluation of random dot stereoacuity cards in infants.
Calloway SL; Lloyd IC; Henson DB
Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):629-34. PubMed ID: 11702975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modification of the titmus fly test to improve accuracy.
Arnoldi K; Frenkel A
Am Orthopt J; 2014; 64():64-70. PubMed ID: 25313113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.
Odell NV; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Adams WE; Holmes JM
J AAPOS; 2009 Apr; 13(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19071047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test--retest variability of Randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children.
Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 22317911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereopsis testing without polarized glasses: a comparison study on five new stereoacuity tests.
Hatch SW; Richman JE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Sep; 65(9):637-41. PubMed ID: 7963223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls in the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.
Sitko KR; Peragallo JH; Bidot S; Biousse V; Newman NJ; Bruce BB
Ophthalmology; 2016 Jan; 123(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 26481817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
