These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Pimenta L; McAfee PC; Cappuccino A; Cunningham BW; Diaz R; Coutinho E Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1337-44. PubMed ID: 17515823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L. Tumialán LM; Ponton RP; Garvin A; Gluf WM Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E18. PubMed ID: 20568934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Early clinical and radiological results following cervical disc arthroplasty]. Paściak M; Wadek T; Widuchowski J; Grzywocz J; Werner K; Swiderski M Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2007; 72(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 18092697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc. Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. McAfee PC; Reah C; Gilder K; Eisermann L; Cunningham B Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(11):943-52. PubMed ID: 22037535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Best NM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. McAfee PC Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):177S-181S. PubMed ID: 15541664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up. Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]