These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs. Roberts TA; MacFie HJ; Hudson WR J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Dec; 85(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 7462589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses. Capita R; Prieto M; Alonso-Calleja C J Food Prot; 2004 Jun; 67(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 15222570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Assessment of superficial contamination of bovine and ovine carcasses from the municipal slaughterhouse of Constantine in Algeria]. El OS; El Groud R; Kenana H; Quessy S Can Vet J; 2005 Jul; 46(7):638-40. PubMed ID: 16152721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual evaluation of cattle cleanliness and correlation to carcass microbial contamination during slaughtering. Serraino A; Bardasi L; Riu R; Pizzamiglio V; Liuzzo G; Galletti G; Giacometti F; Merialdi G Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):502-6. PubMed ID: 21906889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the hygiene of pig carcasses using whole-body carcass swabs compared with the four-site method in EC Decision 471. O'Brien SB; Lenahan M; Sweeney T; Sheridan JJ J Food Prot; 2007 Feb; 70(2):432-9. PubMed ID: 17340880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability and practicability of bacteriological monitoring of beef carcass contamination and their rating within a hygiene quality control programme of abattoirs. Untermann F; Stephan R; Dura U; Hofer M; Heimann P Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9029256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An in vitro system for the comparison of excision and wet-dry swabbing for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses. Cenci-Goga BT; Miraglia D; Ranucci D; Branciari R; Budelli L; McCrindle CM; Cioffi A; Mammoli R J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 17477263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relationships between the density of different indicator organisms on sheep and beef carcasses and in frozen beef and sheep meat. Jordan D; Phillips D; Sumner J; Morris S; Jenson I J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17184320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microbial profiles of carcasses and minced meat from kangaroos processed in South Australia. Holds G; Pointon A; Lorimer M; Kiermeier A; Raven G; Sumner J Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):88-92. PubMed ID: 18234385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling. Ghafir Y; Daube G Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hygienic Status Assessment of Two Lamb Slaughterhouses in Spain. Alonso-Calleja C; Guerrero-Ramos E; Capita R J Food Prot; 2017 Jul; 80(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 28598204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of control over the microbiological contamination of carcasses in a lamb carcass dressing process operated with or without pasteurizing treatment. Milios K; Mataragas M; Pantouvakis A; Drosinos EH; Zoiopoulos PE Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21406314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Rapid counting of bacteria isolated from cattle, swine and sheep carcasses using the resazurin method]. Labadie J; Doumbia M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Jun; 179(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6382877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing. Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microbiological contamination of ovine carcasses associated with the presence of wool and faecal material. Biss ME; Hathaway SC J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Dec; 81(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 8972086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant. Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between carcass microbial load recovered by swabbing surfaces of different size and using the reference excision method. Miraglia D; Ranucci D; D'Ovidio V; Branciari R; Severini M Vet Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 29 Suppl 2():339-41. PubMed ID: 16244989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]