These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15638208)

  • 21. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
    Maeder EM; McManus LA
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors' verdict judgments.
    Leippe MR; Bergold AN; Eisenstadt D
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):279-294. PubMed ID: 27136391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.
    Glaser J; Martin KD; Kahn KB
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 26146816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Looking deathworthy: perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes.
    Eberhardt JL; Davies PG; Purdie-Vaughns VJ; Johnson SL
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 16683924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.
    Shaked-Schroer N; Costanzo M; Marcus-Newhall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):603-17. PubMed ID: 18788078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment.
    Mitchell TL; Haw RM; Pfeifer JE; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):621-37. PubMed ID: 16382353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
    Abshire J; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
    Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
    Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
    Allely CS; Cooper P
    J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.