331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15638210)
1. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
Devenport JL; Cutler BL
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.
Devenport JL; Stinson V; Cutler BL; Kravitz DA
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1042-54. PubMed ID: 12558212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.
Martire KA; Kemp RI
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.
LaBat DE; Goldfarb D; Evans JR; Compo NS; Koolmees CJ; LaPorte G; Lothridge K
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Oct; 47(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 37603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
Eastwood J; Caldwell J
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
Maeder EM; Pica E
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
Cooper J; Hall J
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors' decisions.
Schuller RA; Rzepa S
Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 12508700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mock juror perception of sexual assault nurse examiner testimony.
Wasarhaley NE; Simcic TA; Golding JM
Violence Vict; 2012; 27(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 22978071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.
Golding JM; Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Lippert A; Magyarics CL
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 26294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?
Wise RA; Kehn A
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 32944129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments.
Brewer N; Burke A
Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 12061623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
Abshire J; Bornstein BH
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
