219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15639506)
1. The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading.
McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):801-20. PubMed ID: 15639506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades.
McDonald SA
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15797772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
Kennedy A; Pynte J
Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: a dead zone for the global effect.
Vitu F; Lancelin D; Jean A; Farioli F
Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4684-708. PubMed ID: 17049960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
Lavidor M; Walsh V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1215-27. PubMed ID: 17275060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.
Schroyens W; Vitu F; Brysbaert M; d'Ydewalle G
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):1021-46. PubMed ID: 10605397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.
McDonald SA
Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4416-24. PubMed ID: 17045323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
