219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15639561)
1. Forensic DNA databases.
Corte-Real F
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S143-4. PubMed ID: 15639561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forensics. The FBI's national DNA database.
Hoyle R
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 16(11):987. PubMed ID: 9831012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
Parfett J
Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Donnan S
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool?
Hibbert M
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
Rosen C
New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases.
Williams R; Johnson P
New Genet Soc; 2004 Aug; 23(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 15460615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Of doctors and detectives.
Scott G; Marshall MF; Tindall C
N Y Times Web; 2001 Nov; ():F7. PubMed ID: 12159885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Giuliani backs DNA testing of newborns for identification.
Lambert B
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11647658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy.
Shapiro ED; Weinberg ML
Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(3):455-86. PubMed ID: 11651144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The expanding use of DNA in law enforcement: what role for privacy?
Rothstein MA; Talbott MK
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 16789940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
Tracy PE; Morgan V
J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of Spanish attitudes regarding the custody and use of forensic DNA databases.
Gamero JJ; Romero JL; Peralta JL; Corte-Real F; Guillén M; Anjos MJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 19083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
Baumann TK
Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prisoner's DNA database ruled unlawful.
Lehrman S
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):818. PubMed ID: 9732855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA testing proposals.
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():A32. PubMed ID: 11647657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Expanding file of DNA riles Britain.
MacLeod A
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Sep; 92(201):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
