BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1563990)

  • 1. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of live and carcass characteristics of market hogs by use of a single longitudinal ultrasonic scan.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Riemann MJ; Wyatt RW; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1409-16. PubMed ID: 8071163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pork carcass evaluation with an automated and computerized ultrasonic system.
    Liu Y; Stouffer JR
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jan; 73(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 7601745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
    Pringle TD; Williams SE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
    Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of carcass composition, ham and foreleg weights, and lean meat yields of Iberian pigs using ultrasound measurements in live animals.
    Ayuso D; González A; Hernández F; Corral JM; Izquierdo M
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1884-92. PubMed ID: 23408817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of transverse and longitudinal real-time ultrasound scans for prediction of lean cut yields and fat-free lean content in live pigs.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; Miller KD; Novakofski J; Wilson ER; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2566-76. PubMed ID: 8923171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1736-42. PubMed ID: 12854810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 12643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
    McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ractopamine treatment biases in the prediction of pork carcass composition.
    Schinckel AP; Herr CT; Richert BT; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 12597368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
    Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.
    Hicks C; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Akridge JT; Wagner JR; Chen W
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2221-34. PubMed ID: 9781476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of carcass characteristics by real-time ultrasound in barrows and gilts slaughtered at three weights.
    Smith BS; Jones WR; Hough JD; Huffman DL; Mikel WB; Mulvaney DR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2304-8. PubMed ID: 1506294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
    Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic parameters for pork carcass components.
    Newcom DW; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Dec; 80(12):3099-106. PubMed ID: 12542149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.