BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1563990)

  • 21. Practical means for estimating pork carcass composition.
    Orcutt MW; Forrest JC; Judge MD; Schinckel AP; Kuei CH
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):3987-97. PubMed ID: 2286542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; McKeith FK; McCaw J; Fernando RL
    J Anim Sci; 1996 May; 74(5):925-33. PubMed ID: 8726722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Growth, development, and carcass composition in five genotypes of swine.
    Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1719-29. PubMed ID: 1634396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using ultrasound technology to predict pork carcass composition.
    Terry CA; Savell JW; Recio HA; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1989 May; 67(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 2661515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of intramuscular fat percentage in live swine using real-time ultrasound.
    Newcom DW; Baas TJ; Lampe JF
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Dec; 80(12):3046-52. PubMed ID: 12542142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Harris JJ; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Williams FL; Wise JW; Cross HR; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2000 May; 78(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 10834579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Composition of pork carcasses by potassium-40 liquid scintillation detection: estimation and validation.
    Siemens AL; Lipsey RJ; Martin WM; Siemens MG; Hedrick HB
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jan; 69(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2005037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of porcine somatotropin on growth and carcass composition of Meishan and Yorkshire barrows.
    White BR; Lan YH; McKeith FK; McLaren DG; Novakofski J; Wheeler MB; Kasser TR
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Dec; 71(12):3226-38. PubMed ID: 8294274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of lamb carcass composition from live animal measurement of bioelectrical impedance or ultrasonic tissue depths.
    Berg EP; Neary MK; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2672-8. PubMed ID: 8923181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of real-time ultrasonic measurements of backfat and loin muscle area in swine using multiple statistical analysis procedures.
    Moeller SJ; Christian LL
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2503-14. PubMed ID: 9814887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pork carcass composition: II. Use of indicator cuts for predicting carcass composition.
    Swensen K; Ellis M; Brewer MS; Novakofski J; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2405-14. PubMed ID: 9781497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of carcass composition by ultrasound measurements in 4 anatomical locations of 3 commercial categories of lamb.
    Ripoll G; Joy M; Sanz A
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3409-18. PubMed ID: 20562368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of alternative measures of pork carcass composition.
    Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2001 May; 79(5):1093-119. PubMed ID: 11374529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
    Akridge JT; Brorsen BW; Whipker LD; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 1582906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The prediction of percentage of fat in pork carcasses.
    Johnson LP; Miller MF; Haydon KD; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4185-92. PubMed ID: 2286560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.