These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1563996)

  • 1. Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: II. Feedlot segment.
    Lamb MA; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):700-13. PubMed ID: 1563996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: III. Integrated system.
    Lamb MA; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):714-22. PubMed ID: 1563997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breed effects, dietary energy density effects, and retained heterosis on different measures of gain efficiency in beef cattle.
    Gregory KE; Cundiff LV; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1138-54. PubMed ID: 8056658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment.
    Lamb MA; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):689-99. PubMed ID: 1563995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: IV. Accounting for variability and genetic trends.
    Lamb MA; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):587-94. PubMed ID: 8463144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle evaluation of five biological types of beef cattle in a cow-calf range production system: II. Biological and economic performance.
    Davis KC; Tess MW; Kress DD; Doornbos DE; Anderson DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2591-8. PubMed ID: 7883616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breed effects and retained heterosis for growth, carcass, and meat traits in advanced generations of composite populations of beef cattle.
    Gregory KE; Cundiff LV; Koch RM; Dikeman ME; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Apr; 72(4):833-50. PubMed ID: 8014148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal breed of sire effects on postweaning performance of heifer and steer progeny: postweaning growth and carcass characteristics.
    Urick JJ; Reynolds WL; Knapp BW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Nov; 69(11):4377-87. PubMed ID: 1752813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two- and three-way rotational crossing, beef x beef and beef x Brown Swiss composite breed production: postweaning growth and carcass traits.
    Urick JJ; Pahnish OF; Knapp BW; Reynolds WL; Milmine WL
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2603-8. PubMed ID: 2808166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preweaning growth traits for Senepol, Hereford, and reciprocal crossbred calves and feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers.
    Chase CC; Olson TA; Hammond AC; Menchaca MA; West RL; Johnson DD; Butts WT
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Dec; 76(12):2967-75. PubMed ID: 9928599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameters for carcass weight, conformation and fat in five beef cattle breeds.
    Kause A; Mikkola L; Strandén I; Sirkko K
    Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25166753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcass characteristics of cattle differing in Jersey proportion.
    Berry DP; Judge MJ; Evans RD; Buckley F; Cromie AR
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11052-11060. PubMed ID: 30268620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of forage and protein source on feedlot performance and carcass traits of Holstein and crossbred beef steers.
    Comerford JW; House RB; Harpster HW; Henning WR; Cooper JB
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1022-31. PubMed ID: 1582930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of percentage Brahman and Angus breeding, age-season of feeding and slaughter end point on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics.
    Huffman RD; Williams SE; Hargrove DD; Johnson DD; Marshall TT
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Aug; 68(8):2243-52. PubMed ID: 2401646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal grandsire, granddam, and sire breed effects on growth and carcass traits of crossbred cattle.
    Casas E; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):904-11. PubMed ID: 12723078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breed effects, retained heterosis, and estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat traits of beef cattle.
    Gregory KE; Cundiff LV; Koch RM; Dikeman ME; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 8056661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a computer model to predict optimum slaughter end points for different biological types of feeder cattle.
    Williams CB; Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Oct; 73(10):2903-15. PubMed ID: 8617660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of sire breed on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of beef × Holstein steers.
    Basiel BL; Campbell JA; Dechow CD; Felix TL
    Transl Anim Sci; 2024; 8():txae043. PubMed ID: 38601078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship among performance, carcass, and feed efficiency characteristics, and their ability to predict economic value in the feedlot.
    Retallick KM; Faulkner DB; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Nkrumah JD; Shike DW
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5954-61. PubMed ID: 24265328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Charolais and Limousin as terminal cross sire breeds.
    Dhuyvetter JM; Frahm RR; Marshall DM
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Apr; 60(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 3988657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.