These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15640416)

  • 1. Power injection of microcatheters: an in vitro comparison.
    Brown DB; Papadouris DC; Davis RV; Vedantham S; Pilgram TK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 15640416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Injection rate threshold of triple-lumen central venous catheters: an in vitro study.
    Zamos DT; Emch TM; Patton HA; D'Amico FJ; Bansal SK
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 17434071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of CT contrast media.
    Ruess L; Bulas DI; Rivera O; Markle BM
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 9169679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central venous catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium.
    Macha DB; Nelson RC; Howle LE; Hollingsworth JW; Schindera ST
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):870-8. PubMed ID: 19789224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system--results of an in vitro study].
    Gebauer B; Teichgräber UK; Hothan T; Felix R; Wagner HJ
    Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16170712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power injection of intravenous contrast material through central venous catheters for CT: in vitro evaluation.
    Herts BR; Cohen MA; McInroy B; Davros WJ; Zepp RC; Einstein DM
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):731-5. PubMed ID: 8756923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of different vein catheter sizes for mechanical power injection in CT: in vitro evaluation with use of a circulation phantom.
    Behrendt FF; Bruners P; Keil S; Plumhans C; Mahnken AH; Stanzel S; Das M; Günther RW; Mühlenbruch G
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18521665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media: the impact of temperature on maximum injection pressures at different cannula sizes.
    Schwab SA; Kuefner MA; Anders K; Adamietz B; Heinrich MC; Baigger JF; Janka R; Uder M; Kramer M
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1502-8. PubMed ID: 19896067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study.
    Schwab SA; Uder M; Anders K; Heinrich MC; Kuefner MA
    Rofo; 2009 Apr; 181(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 19280548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power injection of iodinated intravenous contrast material through acute and chronic hemodialysis catheters.
    Hollander S; Mojibian H; Emery M; Tal MG
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 21725947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power injection of peripherally inserted central catheters.
    Rivitz SM; Drucker EA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 9314379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental study of flow rates in microcatheters using various kinds of contrast materials: comparison of imaging capability by iodine delivery rates].
    Nitatori T; Dohno S; Hanaoka H; Takei R; Hachiya J; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1263-9. PubMed ID: 7610029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of new 4 French catheters by comparison to 6 French coronary artery images.
    Saito T; Date H; Taniguchi I; Hokimoto S; Yamamoto N; Nakamura S; Ishibashi F; Noda K; Oshima S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10745431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximal flow rates possible during power injection through currently available PICCs: an in vitro study.
    Salis AI; Eclavea A; Johnson MS; Patel NH; Wong DG; Tennery G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15028813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidural multiorifice catheters function as single-orifice catheters: an in vitro study.
    Fegley AJ; Lerman J; Wissler R
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Sep; 107(3):1079-81. PubMed ID: 18713933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polyvinyl alcohol foam particle sizes and concentrations injectable through microcatheters.
    Barr JD; Lemley TJ; Petrochko CN
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(1 Pt 1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9468404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro study assessing the technical feasibility of using 3-F inner dilators for imaging.
    Palacios RG; Hardman RL; Lopera J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7):959-63. PubMed ID: 19555890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative flow rates of thin-walled and conventional-walled intravenous catheters.
    Bohn CM
    AANA J; 1991 Oct; 59(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 1957570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In-vitro comparison of the effectiveness of different high-speed rotatory catheters].
    Müller-Hülsbeck S; Dimitte DN; Jahnke T; Hedderich J; Grimm J; Heller M
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):406-12. PubMed ID: 12635019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and feasibility of using a central venous catheter for rapid contrast injection rates.
    Sanelli PC; Deshmukh M; Ougorets I; Caiati R; Heier LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15547237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.