These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15641431)

  • 1. Free associations and dominance ratings of homophones for young and older adults.
    White KK; Abrams L
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):408-20. PubMed ID: 15641431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception-production asymmetries in homophone spelling: the unique influence of aging.
    White KK; Abrams L; Zoller SM
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 Sep; 68(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 23161347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the norming of homophones.
    Gorfein DS; Weingartner KM
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 May; 40(2):522-30. PubMed ID: 18522063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling.
    White KK; Abrams L; Palm GM; Protasi MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21787089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonologically mediated priming of preexisting and new associations in young and older adults.
    White KK; Abrams L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):645-55. PubMed ID: 15099133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking.
    Jared D; O'Donnell K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):334-346. PubMed ID: 27752961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
    Burt JS; Jared D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective Norms for Italian Words in Older Adults: Age Differences in Ratings of Valence, Arousal and Dominance.
    Fairfield B; Ambrosini E; Mammarella N; Montefinese M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169472. PubMed ID: 28046070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do phonology and orthography feed back to influence syntactic encoding in language production? Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin.
    Wang M; Cai ZG; Wang R; Branigan HP; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1807-1819. PubMed ID: 32427052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?
    Biedermann B; Nickels L
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 15641430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: evidence from Spanish and French.
    Cuetos F; Bonin P; Alameda JR; Caramazza A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):750-71. PubMed ID: 19728227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why did I right that? Factors that influence the production of homophone substitution errors.
    White KK; Abrams L; Zoller SM; Gibson SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):977-85. PubMed ID: 18570137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).
    Caramazza A; Bi Y; Costa A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are there Individual Differences in Learning Homophones During Silent Reading?
    Deibel ME; Folk JR
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):1121-1142. PubMed ID: 35593992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.
    Conwell E
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):466-479. PubMed ID: 29096575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms.
    Sandra D
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):405-44. PubMed ID: 21033654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.
    Ferrand L; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; New B; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19001395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of linguistic context on young children's understanding of homophonic words.
    Beveridge M; Marsh L
    J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 1874838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
    Miozzo M; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.