These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15641893)

  • 1. Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences.
    Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):108-31. PubMed ID: 15641893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings.
    Sturman MC; Cheramie RA; Cashen LH
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 15769237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.
    Schmidt FL; Zimmerman RD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 15161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model.
    Heidemeier H; Moser K
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty.
    Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 12002962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
    Ng TW; Feldman DC
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):392-423. PubMed ID: 18361640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: a meta-analysis of panel studies.
    Riketta M
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18361647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing between task and contextual performance for nurses: development of a job performance scale.
    Greenslade JH; Jimmieson NL
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jun; 58(6):602-11. PubMed ID: 17442026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.
    Payne SC; Youngcourt SS; Beaubien JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jan; 92(1):128-50. PubMed ID: 17227156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment.
    Zhang X; Bartol KM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):862-73. PubMed ID: 20718512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings.
    Oh IS; Berry CM
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Nov; 94(6):1498-513. PubMed ID: 19916658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.
    Hunter JE; Schmidt FL; Le H
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):594-612. PubMed ID: 16737357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance appraisal: match the tool to the task.
    McMillan JD; Doyel HW
    Personnel; 1980; 57(4):12-20. PubMed ID: 10248411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.
    Barrick MR; Shaffer JA; DeGrassi SW
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Nov; 94(6):1394-411. PubMed ID: 19916651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Standards for performance appraisal of academic staff at a nursing college].
    Aucamp H; Muller M
    Curationis; 2000 Mar; 23(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 11140024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance.
    Hochwarter WA; Witt LA; Treadway DC; Ferris GR
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 16551199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.
    Salgado JF; Anderson N; Moscoso S; Bertua C; de Fruyt F; Rolland JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):1068-81. PubMed ID: 14640817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer of management training from alternative perspectives.
    Taylor PJ; Russ-Eft DF; Taylor H
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):104-21. PubMed ID: 19186899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.